adri wrote:I am sorry, but I am not at all pleased by this choice of Zwolle. The organ, as a baroque instrument, is not very good. It has lost its baroque sound a great deal.
Why are you so critical, Adri? Ofcourse it is true that the Zwolle Schnitger is in need of a restoration according to the latest principles. But even in its present state I think the organ will still be a valuable addition to the Hauptwerk library.
When Flentrop restorated the organ back in the 1950's the experts didn't have the knowledge they now have. But don't we all enjoy the sound of the Helmut Walcha recordings at the Alkmaar Schnitger? This organ was also restorated by Flentrop directly after the second World War, and it wasn't until the second Flentrop restoration (in the 1980's) that the instrument got back its proper wind supply.
You say you don't like the sound of the Zwolle instrument. Listen to Bram Beekman's recording of Bach's "Corelli" Fugue BWV 579. Don't you just love those wonderful 8' and 4' flutes?
adri wrote:Also, since Kampen is being done anyway, what's the point of having Zwolle?
I don't understand this. Kampen is a totally different instrument by another builder. Do you mean to say, that for you, only
one Silbermann,
one Schnitger,
one Cavaille-Coll etc, will do?
There are other reasons why the sampling of the Zwolle organ is great news. I really do hope this project will serve to have a positive "psychological" effect on church committees elsewhere who until now refuse to have their organs sampled. You know the Dutch saying: "Als er één schaap over de dam is, volgen er meer" (If one sheep leaps over the ditch all the rest will follow).
Lastly, the organ is being sampled by Jiri Zurek. Jiri is a producer of first class sample sets, so I rest assured the organ is in good hands.
All the best!