Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:16 am
In general, IR's are not related to samples in any way. The use of the convolution reverb is not limited to the sample set, you may convolve anything in world you want. Therefore, I think that your question mixed different things together.
1) Stereo image of the Zwolle Dry sample set: the samples are mono, but they are panned accross the compass to match more or less the real "panning" of the pipes in the Zwolle organ. The original instrument has divided windchests into left and right side (C and C#) but different divisions have different "panning" of the pipes. This was respected in the sample set. So, even without any reverberation at all, you still get stereo sound, as if the organ was in your room and the pipes were spread in all the corners of the room.
2) the IR's on my web pages are pure artificial, therefore, they are not related to the Zwolle church in any way. However, when designing these artificial impulses, we measured the response of the church itself. The measured real impulse response was not quite usable for the convolution, but at least we have got precise information about the acoustics of the space. This was then regenerated synthetically, so that the artificial impulse responses I offer are reproducing faithfully the behavior of the Zwolle church, but in "perfect" conditions so that the result is more suitable for the convolution.