This guy is a believer in 96 khz because this preserves the harmonics in the audio signal best.
https://gearspace.com/board/the-moan-zo ... again.htmlHe stated
The greater the sampling rate, the more harmonics can be used to "reshape" the original wave closer to the ideal (original) and consequently the better (i.e., closer to the original) the transients will become.
So also harmonics outside the spectrum we can hear will shape the sound and this is in favour of higher sample rates.
In my younger years i had Tannoy supertweeters in my system.
And altough their frequency started at 15000hz, already at the end or above my hearing range, engaging these tweeters improved the spatiality and transparancy of the sound a lot i think due the extended frequency range of Sacd players .
In my opininon preserving the larger freq.range in 96 khz to preserve the harmonic content in the non audible range is a good thing.
Why did lots of the people on this forum and pcorgan forum stated that they heared an improvement when the 96 khz Hauptwerk version was introduced?
Jan